Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs
Date: 2005-04-24 19:01:24
Message-ID: 22548.1114369284@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> I'm seeing this kind of "performance plunge" on 8.1cvs in one of every 3 runs.
> It's obviously a serious stability issue, whatever is causing it.

I concur with the upthread suggestion that it may come from not doing
checkpoints in a realistic fashion, thereby allowing too much queued
I/O work to build up. What happens if you set the checkpoint interval
to 5 or 10 minutes?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-04-24 19:06:05 Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-04-24 18:52:55 Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs