From: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alexandre Vasconcelos <alex(dot)vasconcelos(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Large objetcs performance |
Date: | 2007-04-04 14:11:27 |
Message-ID: | 2252379A-2C12-47C0-A22A-635BD21E4E27@event-s.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 04.04.2007, at 08:03, Alexandre Vasconcelos wrote:
> We have an application subjected do sign documents and store them
> somewhere. The files size may vary from Kb to Mb. Delelopers are
> arguing about the reasons to store files direcly on operating system
> file system or on the database, as large objects. My boss is
> considering file system storing, because he is concerned about
> integrity, backup/restore corruptions. I'd like to know some reasons
> to convince them to store these files on PosgtreSQL, including
> integrity, and of course, performance. I would like to know the file
> system storing disadvantages as well.
It is not directly PostgreSQL related, but this might give you
something to think about:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/Web_Applications/
Development/Database_vs_Filesystem
cug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jason@ohloh.net | 2007-04-04 14:12:20 | Re: SCSI vs SATA |
Previous Message | Alexandre Vasconcelos | 2007-04-04 14:03:49 | Large objetcs performance |