| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, bpalmer <bpalmer(at)crimelabs(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: $PGDATA/base/??? |
| Date: | 2001-01-18 01:44:27 |
| Message-ID: | 22509.979782267@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> I object. The code displays oids and tablenames or relnames. Oid is just
> the initial, default filename for tables, and may change to something other
> than the oid. Currently, the reindex code is the only place that could change
> the relfilenode without changing the oid, but I think there may be more
> in the future.
Right, relfilenode is the thing to look at, not OID. I believe we are
thinking of using relfilenode updates for a number of things in the
future --- CLUSTER and faster index rebuilds in VACUUM are two thoughts
that come to mind ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aditya Damle | 2001-01-18 03:20:52 | A bug with unique indicies |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-01-18 01:07:47 | Re: copy from stdin; bug? |