| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sync scan & regression tests |
| Date: | 2023-08-06 22:30:49 |
| Message-ID: | 224955.1691361049@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru> writes:
> Is it is ok, that regression tests do not pass with small value of
> shared buffers (for example 1Mb)?
There are quite a few GUC settings with which you can break the
regression tests. I'm not especially bothered by this one.
> More general question - is it really good that in situation when there
> is actually no concurrent queries, seqscan is started not from the first
> page?
You're going to have race-condition issues if you try to make that
(not) happen, I should think.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-08-06 23:29:58 | Re: Sync scan & regression tests |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2023-08-06 22:28:51 | Re: Use of additional index columns in rows filtering |