Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Chris Campbell <chris(at)bignerdranch(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?
Date: 2004-06-04 05:10:08
Message-ID: 22444.1086325808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The following patch adds start/stop times for pg_dump and pg_dumpall

What happens in a pg_dump -Fc / pg_restore scenario?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mike g 2004-06-04 05:35:05 upper() / lower() regression test case needed?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-04 05:03:20 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-06-04 08:26:19 Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-06-04 05:03:20 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment?