Re: ALTER TABLE should change respective views

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Archana Sundararam <archnasr(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE should change respective views
Date: 2009-05-05 18:31:33
Message-ID: 22431.1241548293@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Incompatible table changes would still require manual drop and
> recreation, of course. But most table changes to a production database
> are adding fields or changing constraints, which in most cases won't
> break dependant views or functions.

... as indeed they don't. What's your point? The question here was
about whether the DB should try to guess the right behavior for a
datatype change in an existing column.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-05-05 18:37:10 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-05-05 18:20:00 Re: community equipment