Re: ts_rewrite aggregate API seems mighty ugly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ts_rewrite aggregate API seems mighty ugly
Date: 2007-10-18 13:47:37
Message-ID: 22410.1192715257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> The two-argument form may not be actively broken but it sounds not very
> integrated. Passing a string which is then planned as an SQL query is not very
> SQL-ish.

True. I'll bet you don't like ts_stat() either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-18 13:52:23 Re: Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-10-18 13:38:40 Re: max_prepared_transactions default ... why 5?