From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jonathan Tapicer <tapicer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Multiple foreign keys with the same name and information_schema |
Date: | 2009-08-10 15:07:54 |
Message-ID: | 2240.1249916874@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jonathan Tapicer <tapicer(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I was a able to do it using the pg_catalog tables, but I haven't found
> a way to do it using information_schema since it relies on foreign
> keys names being unique in the same catalog. Is this a known
> limitation?
Actually, the information_schema supposes that constraint names are
unique within a *schema*, not within a *catalog* (a/k/a database).
Don't know if that distinction can help you or not. You are correct
that Postgres is less rigid. We do not consider that to be a deficiency
on the Postgres side ;-)
If you want to use the information_schema to deal with this stuff, the
answer is to make sure that your application follows the SQL-standard
rule of not duplicating constraint names within a schema.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Tapicer | 2009-08-10 15:25:22 | Re: Multiple foreign keys with the same name and information_schema |
Previous Message | Jonathan Tapicer | 2009-08-10 13:55:42 | Multiple foreign keys with the same name and information_schema |