From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
Date: | 2008-04-14 20:39:49 |
Message-ID: | 22376.1208205589@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> How did you feel about the idea of having a Tom-free commitfest for May?
Not a lot, though certainly I'd be willing to disengage from trivial
patches if someone else picked them up.
One problem with this fest was that a whole lot of the patches *weren't*
trivial; if they had been they'd not have gotten put off till 8.4. So
there weren't that many that I wanted to let go in without looking at
them. I guess that's just another way in which the 8.3 schedule problem
came home to roost during this fest.
In future fests we should have a much higher proportion of "little
things" that maybe more people would feel comfortable taking
responsibility for.
Perhaps it would be useful to try to rate pending patches by difficulty?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-14 20:43:22 | Re: pg_dump object sorting |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-14 20:31:27 | Re: Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag? |