Re: Not *quite* there on ecpg fixes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not *quite* there on ecpg fixes
Date: 2007-10-04 15:42:50
Message-ID: 22343.1191512570@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Michael Meskes wrote:
>> These lines are simply copied from libpq/Makefile but ddltool does not
>> complain while working on libpq. Any idea where they differ?

> Newline style perhaps?

There seems to be a blank line at the end of
interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/exports.txt ... maybe that is producing a
bogus line in the .def file?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-10-04 15:43:24 Re: What does 'elapsed' exact means in PostgreSQL Log Statistics
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-10-04 15:33:06 Re: Not *quite* there on ecpg fixes