| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why does pgindent's README say to download typedefs.list from the buildfarm? |
| Date: | 2024-05-17 01:09:36 |
| Message-ID: | 2233228.1715908176@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:45:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... I think the enum should be nuked altogether, but
>> it's a bit late to be redesigning that for v17 perhaps.
> You're right, WaitEventExtension is better gone. The only thing that
> matters is that we want to start computing the IDs assigned to the
> custom wait events for extensions with a number higher than the
> existing WAIT_EXTENSION to avoid interferences in pg_stat_activity, so
> this could be cleaned up as the attached.
WFM, and this is probably a place where we don't want to change the
API in v17 and again in v18, so I agree with pushing now.
Reminder though: beta1 release freeze begins Saturday.
Not many hours left.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-05-17 01:12:53 | Re: WAL record CRC calculated incorrectly because of underlying buffer modification |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-05-17 00:45:59 | Re: Why does pgindent's README say to download typedefs.list from the buildfarm? |