| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
| Date: | 2002-08-15 13:18:30 |
| Message-ID: | 22311.1029417510@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
> I don't even know if "." is allowed in the schema names,
It isn't, and we couldn't invent such a scheme without seriously
diverging from SQL compliance: the next naming level up from schemas is
reserved for catalogs (think databases). I don't know that we'll ever
support cross-database access, but we shouldn't foreclose the
possibility in pursuit of a naming scheme that doesn't really add very
much value.
You could possibly fake it with schema names like org_postgresql_foo,
but I can't get very excited about that ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-15 14:02:51 | Re: contrib Makefiles |
| Previous Message | Patrick Welche | 2002-08-15 12:19:42 | Re: Open 7.3 issues |