| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ... |
| Date: | 2004-11-28 23:58:16 |
| Message-ID: | 22309.1101686296@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> What is the general opinion of this? I'd like to implement it, but not so
> much so that I'm going to beat my head against a brick wall on it ...
I think we've discussed this in the past, and the consensus has always
been that more people like it as-is than want to change it. I'm
certainly in the leave-it-as-is camp.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-11-29 01:24:25 | Re: PGSQL: The Gateway will be kept. |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-11-28 23:34:28 | Adding Reply-To: <listname> to Lists configuration ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-11-29 00:03:19 | Re: Stopgap solution for table-size-estimate updating |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-11-28 23:46:15 | Re: psql and schemas |