From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |
Date: | 2007-11-22 00:22:45 |
Message-ID: | 22308.1195690965@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Guillaume Smet wrote:
>> *** 8.2 ***
>> tps = 853.360277 (including connections establishing)
>>
>> *** 8.3 ***
>> tps = 784.819087 (including connections establishing)
> This is an 8% drop. I've seen a larger difference than that between two
> identical installations of the same version when the database is many GB
> large. Hard drives deliver a higher transfer rate at their inner
> portions, typically the start of the disk from the operating system's
> perspective. It's not unusual for the slow parts of the disk to be 30-40%
> slower than the fast ones.
FWIW, the test cases I was just comparing are entirely CPU-bound ---
vmstat says there are no disk reads happening at all. Now I only got a
3% drop, so that may not be the same effect Guillaume is seeing. But
the whole thing is a bit upsetting seeing that we thought we'd reduced
the overhead for short read-only transactions ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2007-11-22 00:39:56 | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-11-21 23:59:03 | Re: 8.3devel slower than 8.2 under read-only load |