Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> Considering that the data we are working with is binary, and may contain
>> nulls, any code that insisted on null-termination would probably be ipso
>> facto broken.
> But we're not; this is the same code that sends the COPY output back to PG.
Oh, isn't this the code that pushes large-object bodies around? I
should think the problem would've been noticed much sooner if not...
regards, tom lane