Re: postgres help

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: goa <goalinux(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres help
Date: 2005-04-11 06:25:58
Message-ID: 22298.1113200758@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 02:46:01AM -0700, goa wrote:
>> We had developed some apllication with postgres-7.0.3-8 as back end
>> now that we have upgraded all our servers to redhat9.0,also we cannot
>> use new version of postgres since there is some issues with date fields
>> which we use of postgres-7.0

> Could you elaborate on those issues? 7.0.3 is over four years
> old -- aside from new functionality in later releases, there have
> been numerous bug fixes since then. You really should consider
> using a newer version; I'm sure the people on these lists would be
> willing to help solve whatever problems that might cause.

The oldest version that the community considers even slightly supported
is 7.2.*. 7.1.* and before have fundamental, unfixable data-loss risks
(for instance, after 4 billion transactions you WILL lose all your data
in 7.0.*). So you would be far better advised to spend your effort on
fixing your application to make it play with a current PG release than
on trying to recompile such an ancient release.

BTW, with my Red Hat hat on, I would say that RHL9 is about equally
obsolete. Why aren't you updating to a more modern platform, if you're
troubling to update at all?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Galanakis 2005-04-11 06:26:06 Mysql to postgres
Previous Message Inpreet Singh 2005-04-11 05:20:01 Log File Maintainance