| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | goa <goalinux(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgres help |
| Date: | 2005-04-11 06:25:58 |
| Message-ID: | 22298.1113200758@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 02:46:01AM -0700, goa wrote:
>> We had developed some apllication with postgres-7.0.3-8 as back end
>> now that we have upgraded all our servers to redhat9.0,also we cannot
>> use new version of postgres since there is some issues with date fields
>> which we use of postgres-7.0
> Could you elaborate on those issues? 7.0.3 is over four years
> old -- aside from new functionality in later releases, there have
> been numerous bug fixes since then. You really should consider
> using a newer version; I'm sure the people on these lists would be
> willing to help solve whatever problems that might cause.
The oldest version that the community considers even slightly supported
is 7.2.*. 7.1.* and before have fundamental, unfixable data-loss risks
(for instance, after 4 billion transactions you WILL lose all your data
in 7.0.*). So you would be far better advised to spend your effort on
fixing your application to make it play with a current PG release than
on trying to recompile such an ancient release.
BTW, with my Red Hat hat on, I would say that RHL9 is about equally
obsolete. Why aren't you updating to a more modern platform, if you're
troubling to update at all?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Theo Galanakis | 2005-04-11 06:26:06 | Mysql to postgres |
| Previous Message | Inpreet Singh | 2005-04-11 05:20:01 | Log File Maintainance |