From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Satoshi Nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp |
Subject: | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |
Date: | 2006-08-14 11:58:12 |
Message-ID: | 22273.1155556692@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I was thinking, isn't it a lot cleaner to define the functions to use
> OUT parameters instead of having to define a custom type for each?
Not really --- it's a bit less notation maybe, but if he's got it
written like that already, I see no need to change it.
> Also, in 8.2 there is a uninstall SQL script -- ISTM you should put the
> DROP commands there, not in the install script.
Agreed.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-14 12:09:36 | Re: Google SoC--Idea Request |
Previous Message | ohp | 2006-08-14 09:22:54 | Re: Warthog failing |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-08-14 14:15:56 | Re: Forcing current WAL file to be archived |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-14 04:51:40 | Re: pgstattuple extension for indexes |