From: | Vincent de Phily <vincent(dot)dephily(at)mobile-devices(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: altering foreign key without a table scan |
Date: | 2011-08-19 16:09:25 |
Message-ID: | 22270524.vDhmFqSqtK@moltowork |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Friday 19 August 2011 11:52:50 Tom Lane wrote:
> Vincent de Phily <vincent(dot)dephily(at)mobile-devices(dot)fr> writes:
> > Thanks for your answer. Experimenting a bit, those columns seem to have
> > only a cosmetic impact, meaning that "\d" will show the schema you
> > expect, but the behaviour remains unchanged (even after restarting
> > postgres).
>
> > Digging further however, I found that pg_triggers can be used for my means
> > :
> IIRC, there are fields of pg_constraint that are copied into the
> pg_trigger rows for the supporting triggers, so as to save one catalog
> lookup at run time. If you diddle one manually, you'd better diddle
> both.
Some relid values are indeed duplicated in pg_constraint and pg_trigger, but
it doesn't look like I need to fiddle with those ?
I'm only touching pg_trigger.tgfoid and pg_constraint.confdeltype/confupdtype
(which indeed seem to say the same thing in a different way). Do you know if
there is something else I've missed ?
Thanks.
--
Vincent de Phily
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-19 16:44:40 | Re: Need linux uid in pg-psql |
Previous Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2011-08-19 16:07:41 | Re: Need linux uid in pg-psql |