Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Curtis Faith" <curtis(at)galtair(dot)com>
Cc: "Pgsql-Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes
Date: 2002-10-08 15:08:08
Message-ID: 2225.1034089688@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Curtis Faith" <curtis(at)galtair(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not really worried about doing page-in reads because the disks internal
> buffers should contain most of the blocks surrounding the end of the log
> file. If the successive partial writes exceed a block (which they will in
> heavy use) then most of the time this won't be a problem anyway since the
> disk will gang the full blocks before writing.

You seem to be willing to make quite a large number of assumptions about
what the disk hardware will do or not do. I trust you're going to test
your results on a wide range of hardware before claiming they have any
general validity ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2002-10-08 15:16:55 Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance
Previous Message Curtis Faith 2002-10-08 14:57:15 Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes