From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump bug fixing |
Date: | 2004-07-19 14:44:31 |
Message-ID: | 22237.1090248271@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I think that we should treat the public schema specially :)
We already are to some extent, since pg_dump will dump its comment and
privileges, which it would not do for any other predefined object.
I think this is actually an implementation artifact rather than
something that was explicitly intended at the time, but since no one
has complained about it, it's probably a good thing ;-)
Also, if we're going to apply Fabien's proposed patch to alter the
ownership of the public schema, that's still another way in which the
public schema becomes less like a system-defined object ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-19 15:58:56 | Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-19 14:40:35 | Re: function return type |