From: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: error out when building pg_xlogdump with pgxs |
Date: | 2013-08-29 10:11:19 |
Message-ID: | 2218426.68012B22s7@obelix |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Le jeudi 29 août 2013 11:52:36 Andres Freund a écrit :
> On 2013-08-29 11:49:00 +0200, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> > Le mercredi 28 août 2013 00:12:22 Andres Freund a écrit :
> > > Hi Alvaro,
> > >
> > > On 2013-08-27 14:47:49 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > Andres Freund wrote:
> > > > > pg_xlogdump cannot properly be built with pgxs since it needs a
> > > > > sourcetree around. That already has confused some users...
> > > > >
> > > > > How about the attached patch which will tell it's not supported
> > > > > instead
> > > > > of an ominous build error about files that have no rules?
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, the other option is to ignore USE_PGXS completely and build
> > > > assuming the source tree is always present. That way, if you build
> > > > the
> > > > whole contrib subdir with USE_PGXS=1, you will end up with all modules
> > > > being built, not stop in the middle with an error. This seems more
> > > > useful to me. We could just add a comment that USE_PGXS is ignored.
> > >
> > > What's the point in doing USE_PGXS builds with a full and configured
> > > source present? The only thing I can think of is testing that pgxs
> > > builds are working. In that case it doesn't seem helpful to fake
> > > something into working which is then going to fail for real USE_PGXS
> > > builds (where the original sourcetree won't be at that location
> > > anymore).
> >
> > I had the same idea when Peter wished to remove PGXS from the contrib
> > shiped with postgreSQL.
> >
> > I've been convinced that if we want to apply testing on pgxs makefile then
> > we need something dedicated. Not abusing the current options.
> >
> > I'm in favor of removing PGXS from all contrib makefile, not only this
> > one.
>
> Can we please discuss that in another thread? Anything like removing
> PGXS wholesale is for sure not going to be something in 9.3 and this
> specific issue should be fixed there as it already confused experienced
> users.
Andres, I was answering your question.
Short and re-phrased:
* we should not abuse make USE_PGXS to test the contrib build
* I believe your patch is correct to issue an error when trying to build
pg_xlogdump with PGXS, it is not possible, dot.
--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-08-29 10:16:02 | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-08-29 09:52:36 | Re: error out when building pg_xlogdump with pgxs |