Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rolf Grossmann <grossman(at)securitas(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Date: 2000-02-24 16:48:06
Message-ID: 22183.951410886@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Rolf Grossmann <grossman(at)securitas(dot)net> writes:
>> (Of course psql is not a shell, but that's why we're discussing ...)

> Now, be careful with this statement. Personally, I have already tried to
> use psql as a shell and I think it would be really cool if you could just
> write #!/path/to/psql -f to write sql scripts.

[ straying off-topic ]

Have you tried pgbash? I haven't, but it sounds pretty cool if you
think psql and your shell should be the same thing...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-24 17:03:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Previous Message Rolf Grossmann 2000-02-24 16:44:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-02-24 16:51:46 Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS
Previous Message Rolf Grossmann 2000-02-24 16:44:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0