Re: Odd duplicate database

Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Please send along
>> select xmin, xmax, ctid, cmin, cmax, datname from pg_database;

> template1=# select xmin, xmax, ctid, cmin, cmax, datname from pg_database;
> xmin | xmax | ctid | cmin | cmax | datname
> ------+------+--------+------+------+------------
> 383 | 0 | (0,1) | 0 | 0 | template1
> 384 | 0 | (0,2) | 0 | 0 | template0
> 386 | 0 | (0,3) | 0 | 0 | postgres
> 659 | 0 | (0,10) | 0 | 0 | deadswitch
> 3497 | 3625 | (0,35) | 0 | 0 | nexxia
> (5 rows)

So the "nexxia" row did get updated at some point, and either that
transaction failed to commit or we've got some glitch that made this
row look like it didn't. Have you used any "ALTER DATABASE" commands
against nexxia?

regards, tom lane