Re: [HACKERS] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries
Date: 2006-09-08 19:20:00
Message-ID: 22134.1157743200@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at> writes:
> I did not only add them to the Makefile for interfaces/libpq,
> but also everywhere something is linked against libpq in case
> somebody links static.

I intensely dislike that part of the patch, but will work on applying
the rest.

If we do need to start mentioning all of libpq's dependencies everywhere
it's linked, I think it's time for a generic solution to that, instead
of hacking each such place over again every time a new dependency pops up.
But at the moment I'm unconvinced that we need to do it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2006-09-08 19:41:02 Re: Domains and subtypes, a brief proposal
Previous Message Gevik Babakhani 2006-09-08 19:18:20 Proposal for GUID datatype

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-09-08 19:47:46 Re: [HACKERS] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-09-08 17:59:47 Re: [HACKERS] Simplifying "standby mode"