Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions
Date: 2004-08-10 00:20:59
Message-ID: 22098.1092097259@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> I think Jeff's original point was that he wanted some kind of index
> for all functions, not just ones you already know how to classify.

I thought his point was that he didn't fully know how the docs have
already classified functions, and therefore didn't know which page to
look on to find a given one. This seems a legitimate gripe to me, and
one that can be cured with a more complete index.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff 2004-08-10 14:03:29 Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions
Previous Message David Fetter 2004-08-09 21:40:10 Re: Suggestion on reorganizing functions