| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2012-09-01 19:06:57 |
| Message-ID: | 22095.1346526417@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 02:43:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm inclined to think that the "no sockdir" case is broken and you
>> should get rid of it. If you're starting a postmaster, you can and
>> should tell it a sockdir, period. If you're running a live check this
>> code is all moot anyway.
> I don't think you understand. The "no sockdir" case is only for live
> checks of pre-9.1 old servers, because we can't find the socket
> directory being used. Everything else uses the local directory for the
> socket. If we remove that case, we can't do live checks on pre-9.1
> servers.
If it's a live check, then (a) you aren't restarting the postmaster,
and (b) you wouldn't want to lock out TCP anyway. So adding
--listen-addresses to the string seems pointless and/or wrong.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-01 19:45:25 | Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-01 19:05:01 | Re: Yet another failure mode in pg_upgrade |