| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Matching domains-over-enums to anyenum types |
| Date: | 2022-01-10 17:32:02 |
| Message-ID: | 2208382.1641835922@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ronan Dunklau <ronan(dot)dunklau(at)aiven(dot)io> writes:
> This has been already discussed a long time ago, and the idea was rejected at
> the time since there was no demand for it:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/BANLkTi%3DaGxDbGPSF043V2K-C2vF2YzGz9w%40mail.gmail.com#da4826d2cbbaca20e3440aadb3093158
I see that one of the considerations in that thread was the lack
of arrays over domains. We've since fixed that, so probably it'd
be reasonable to take a fresh look, but I'm not sure that the
conclusion would be the same as what I proposed then.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Lepikhov | 2022-01-10 17:55:36 | Re: Multiple Query IDs for a rewritten parse tree |
| Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2022-01-10 17:00:00 | Re: Why is src/test/modules/committs/t/002_standby.pl flaky? |