Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add PGDLLIMPORT to ScanKeywords and NumScanKeywords.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add PGDLLIMPORT to ScanKeywords and NumScanKeywords.
Date: 2012-03-31 17:17:12
Message-ID: 22075.1333214232@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 03/31/2012 11:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The only simple fix I can see is to rename the symbols in ecpg and
>> pg_dump to something else. This is probably a good thing anyway to
>> reduce confusion. Anybody have another idea?

> Seems the sane thing to do.

Done, we'll see how the buildfarm likes this version ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-03-31 18:43:07 pgsql: Fix O(N^2) behavior in pg_dump for large numbers of owned sequen
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-31 17:16:04 pgsql: Rename frontend keyword arrays to avoid conflict with backend.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-03-31 19:56:41 Re: pg_dump incredibly slow dumping a single schema from a large db
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-03-31 16:52:37 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add PGDLLIMPORT to ScanKeywords and NumScanKeywords.