| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing(at)tweakers(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [kris@obsecurity.org: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems] |
| Date: | 2007-03-05 20:38:51 |
| Message-ID: | 22074.1173127131@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
>> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>>> ouch - do I read that right that even after tom's fixes for the
>>> "regressions" in 8.2.0 we are still 30% slower then the -HEAD checkout
>>> from the middle of the 8.2 development cycle ?
>>
>> Yes, and although I tested about 17 different cvs-checkouts, Tom and I
>> weren't really able to figure out where "it" happened. So its a bit of a
>> mystery why the performance is so much worse.
> double ouch - losing that much in performance without an idea WHY it
> happened is really unfortunate :-(
Keep in mind that Arjen's test exercises some rather narrow scenarios;
IIRC its performance is mostly determined by some complicated
bitmap-indexscan cases. So that "30% slower" bit certainly doesn't
represent an across-the-board figure. As best I can tell, the decisions
the planner happened to be making in late June were peculiarly nicely
suited to his test, but not so much for other cases.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arjen van der Meijden | 2007-03-05 20:50:58 | Re: [kris@obsecurity.org: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems] |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2007-03-05 20:26:45 | Re: Turning off Autovacuum |