| From: | Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] check for ctags utility in make_ctags |
| Date: | 2019-01-03 11:15:11 |
| Message-ID: | 2205856.meAnofT0VS@x200m |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
В письме от четверг, 3 января 2019 г. 10:03:53 MSK пользователь Michael
Paquier написал:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:35:46AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > In fact, that's demonstrably not so: on my RHEL6 and Fedora boxes,
> > /usr/bin/etags isn't owned by any package, because it's a symlink
> > managed by the "alternatives" system. It points to /usr/bin/etags.emacs
> > which is owned by the emacs-common package. So dropping the advice
> > about how to fix the problem seems like a good plan.
>
> +1, let's keep it simple. I would just use "ctags/etags not found"
> as error message.
Actually I was trying to say "Please install 'ctags' [utility] to run
make_ctags". But if all of you read it as "Please install 'ctags' [package] to
run make_ctags", then it is really better to drop the advice.
So I removed it. See the patch.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| check-for-ctags-in-make_ctags_v4.diff | text/x-patch | 676 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-01-03 11:16:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-01-03 11:02:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to change pg_regress diffs to unified by default? |