Re: has anyone looked at burstsort ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: has anyone looked at burstsort ?
Date: 2007-07-13 15:21:18
Message-ID: 22057.1184340078@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> The key to the algorithm is that it uses a trie to bin rows with common
> leading prefixes together. This avoids performing redundant comparisons
> between those columns later.

Interesting, but doesn't that make it utterly useless for sorting in
non-C locales?

I'm not that thrilled with introducing datatype-specific paths into the
sort code anyway; seems like a maintenance nightmare.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-07-13 15:29:16 Re: has anyone looked at burstsort ?
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-07-13 14:29:16 Re: has anyone looked at burstsort ?