Re: table inheritance and DB design

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
Cc: Berend Tober <btober(at)computer(dot)org>, Alec Swan <aukcioner(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table inheritance and DB design
Date: 2004-12-03 16:23:21
Message-ID: 22047.1102091001@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 08:24:38AM -0500, Berend Tober wrote:
>> My personal take-away was that the behavior was not going to be fixed
>> in the near term

> The problem is that no developer is interested in fixing it (it's "low
> on everyone's to-do list").

Not even that so much as that fixing it looks very hard, and there is a
great deal of other stuff to do that yields more bang for less work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed L. 2004-12-03 16:24:48 Re: reclaiming diskspace bloat w/near-zero downtime
Previous Message Berend Tober 2004-12-03 16:17:53 Re: table inheritance and DB design