Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Date: 2003-11-06 20:17:27
Message-ID: 22046.1068149847@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I think that list is a pretty dumb idea in the first place. We have a
> list of developers with company names next to them. Let readers make
> their own recognition evaluation.

That works if you think that the only form of corporate support is
sponsoring a developer. Seems to me that's a bit narrow-minded.
For instance, hub.org is contributing (by providing hosting services)
way more than you might think from the number of times it appears on
the developer list...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-11-06 20:20:43 Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-06 20:08:57 Re: Changes to Contributor List

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-11-06 20:20:43 Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-06 20:08:57 Re: Changes to Contributor List