From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List |
Date: | 2003-11-06 20:17:27 |
Message-ID: | 22046.1068149847@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I think that list is a pretty dumb idea in the first place. We have a
> list of developers with company names next to them. Let readers make
> their own recognition evaluation.
That works if you think that the only form of corporate support is
sponsoring a developer. Seems to me that's a bit narrow-minded.
For instance, hub.org is contributing (by providing hosting services)
way more than you might think from the number of times it appears on
the developer list...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-06 20:20:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-06 20:08:57 | Re: Changes to Contributor List |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-11-06 20:20:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Changes to Contributor List |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-06 20:08:57 | Re: Changes to Contributor List |