From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd |
Date: | 2011-01-28 03:36:12 |
Message-ID: | 22027.1296185772@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue ene 27 20:57:27 -0300 2011:
>> (Note: if you just do "make postgres-A4.pdf", make will unhelpfully
>> throw away the tex-pdf intermediate file upon error. What I have done
>> when I needed to look is to explicitly "make postgres-A4.tex-pdf" and
>> then "make postgres-A4.pdf", which keeps make from discarding the
>> tex-pdf file when the second step fails. I wonder though if we could
>> tweak the makefile to make this less inconvenient.)
> Maybe mark it .PRECIOUS?
Well, it is only an intermediate file, so not sure we want that.
I was wondering more about a behavior where the file would be thrown
away on successful completion but *not* if pdftex fails. I think we
could have that if the sequence were folded into just one make rule
... is there a good reason for .tex-pdf to be a separate target?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-28 03:39:45 | Problem with documentation of upgrades |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-28 03:31:32 | title capitalization |