From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrus" <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Opptimizing projections containing unused columns |
Date: | 2008-10-15 15:46:08 |
Message-ID: | 22026.1224085568@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Andrus" <kobruleht2(at)hot(dot)ee> writes:
> I have lot of autogenerated from projection queries in form
> SELECT source.c1, source.c2, t1.col1, t1.col2, ...
> FROM (SELECT c1, c2, c3, ..... , c20 FROM ... WHERE ... ) source
> LEFT JOIN t2 USING (somecolumn)
> Main SELECT uses only few columns (source.c1 and source.c2 in this sample)
> from source projection.
> 1. Does selecting of unused columns ( c3 ... c20) affect to query prefomance
Don't worry about it. All modern Postgres versions ignore columns that
aren't actually used in the query --- at least for examples as simple as
this one. In cases where you intentionally defeat optimization (eg via
OFFSET 0 in a sub-select) it's possible that the sub-select will compute
all its output columns even though the upper query doesn't use 'em all.
The width field in EXPLAIN output offers a good hint as to how many
columns the query is actually fetching.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-10-15 15:51:53 | Re: Backup strategies |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-10-15 15:46:04 | Re: PL/pgSQL stored procedure returning multiple result sets (SELECTs)? |