Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Relax requirement for INTO with SELECT in pl/pgsql
Date: 2016-09-22 01:11:29
Message-ID: 21a36f7f-e97e-29c5-bd23-5dfeebf9a5ea@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/9/16 2:57 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/6/16 9:59 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> Thanks for the review. All your comments look pretty reasonable. I'll
>> touch it up and resubmit.
>
> This is the last email in this thread that the commit fest app shows. I
> think we are waiting on an updated patch, with docs and tests.

I'm setting this patch to returned with feedback now.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-09-22 01:18:48 Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2016-09-22 00:40:23 Re: Tuplesort merge pre-reading