| From: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Experiences with extensibility |
| Date: | 2008-01-09 07:21:05 |
| Message-ID: | 21C100DF-C484-4C2F-8DE8-DE01B688E489@event-s.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 09.01.2008, at 00:08, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Did you even bother to read the page?
Actually I tried but typed it in the browser and it resolved directly
to continuent.com (which I have as a bookmark) and I wasn't aware of
the Sequoia stuff anymore and combined Contiuent with uni/cluster
directly in my mind. That was the main problem here.
After reading again a bit now, I haven't seen mentioned how many nodes
are required to have a minimum more or less safe fail-over setup.
> Great! I was just trying to show you that there was a JDBC layer
> available for multi-mastering with PostgreSQL.
When I find some time, I might dig a bit deeper in the Sequoia stuff
again. We will see. Thanks for that hint.
cug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ow Mun Heng | 2008-01-09 07:21:22 | Re: Experiences with extensibility |
| Previous Message | Ow Mun Heng | 2008-01-09 07:16:59 | Re: Connect to SQL Server via ODBC from Postgresql |