From: | Anthony Roberts <anthony(dot)roberts(at)linaro(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Mike Holmes <mike(dot)holmes(at)linaro(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, robhenry(at)microsoft(dot)com, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support |
Date: | 2023-08-25 09:40:39 |
Message-ID: | 219d1120-f383-6e63-1954-b3c0ebefa61c@linaro.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Which of these are you looking for us to provide:
* A machine for you to directly access (via a VPN)
* A machine we just run a worker script on that automatically picks up
the builds as required
* Us to do downstream CI
All are possible, but preferably not option 1, as it would mean straight
up pulling out a machine from our build farm, and it has to go through
all sorts of approvals internally. If it's the only way forward I can
kick it up the chain though.
Option 2 and 3 are ones we do for various other projects (ie. 2 - CMake,
3 - OpenSSL)
Thanks,
Anthony
On 17/08/2023 23:28, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Anthony Roberts wrote:
>> Just following up on this, has there been any movement?
>>
>> I did see another message go into the thread here with no reply:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZKPLjLjIjwN2lxkg%40paquier.xyz
> I don't have an environment to test the patch, but I don't object to
> it per se. However, I don't really want to move forward completely
> blindly as well in the long-term.
>
> As mentioned to Niyas, could it be possible to provide to the
> community a buildfarm machine that would be able to test this
> environment? I am not sure what's your status on that. Perhaps this
> is already set up and you are just waiting for the patch to be merged?
> --
> Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-08-25 09:55:46 | Re: logical_replication_mode |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-08-25 09:26:26 | Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe) |