| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | AW: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-21 12:48:43 |
| Message-ID: | 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C605BA5983@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > CREATE LOCATION tabloc IN '/var/private/pgsql';
> > > CREATE TABLE newtab ... IN tabloc;
> >
> > Okay, so we'd have "table spaces" and "database spaces".
> Seems like one
> > "space" ought to be enough.
Yes, one space should be enough.
>
> Does your "database space" correspond to current PostgreSQL's
> database ?
I think we should think of the "database space" as the default "table space"
for this database.
> And is it different from SCHEMA ?
Please don't mix schema and database, they are two different issues.
Even Oracle has a database, only in Oracle you are limited to one database
per instance. We do not want to add this limitation to PostgreSQL.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-06-21 13:02:40 | AW: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-06-21 09:49:26 | AW: Big 7.1 open items |