| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | AW: column aliases |
| Date: | 2000-06-08 10:13:39 |
| Message-ID: | 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C604AF7DCC@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >> What it looks like to me is that we have a bug in the
> expansion of '*'.
> >> It should be generating columns for both the explicit and
> the implicit
> >> FROM clause, but it's evidently deciding that it should
> only produce
> >> output columns for the first one.
>
> Looks like the behavior is still the same (except now it says
> NOTICE: Adding missing FROM-clause entry for table pg_language
> as well). I'm inclined to say we should change it, and am willing
> to do the work if no one objects...
The idea of the NOTICE was to keep the behavior the same as before
but tell the user of the problem. Before you change the behavior
imho the better thing to do would be a hard error.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthias Urlichs | 2000-06-08 11:03:04 | Re: Back online |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-06-08 09:58:12 | AW: Big projet, please help |