AW: Applying TOAST to CURRENT

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Jan Wieck'" <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: "'PostgreSQL HACKERS'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: AW: Applying TOAST to CURRENT
Date: 2000-05-31 07:28:51
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C604AF7DB9@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> Hmmm - thinking about that it doesn't sound bad if we allways
> create a secondary relation at CREATE TABLE time, but NOT the
> index for it. And at VACUUM time we create the index if it
> doesn't exist AND there is external stored data.

Seems we are trying to reduce the dependency on vacuum in other
areas (e.g. overwriting smgr).
I would prefer explicit syntax to enable toast (create table and alter
table).

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-05-31 10:43:54 Re: SET FSYNC command?
Previous Message Peter Vazsonyi 2000-05-31 06:45:08 Re: 7.0 weirdness