From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "'Ansley, Michael'" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, "''pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org ' '" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING |
Date: | 1999-12-17 09:29:40 |
Message-ID: | 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C603FDC1D3@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Yes, you are right, of course, it doesn't mean that it's incorrect.
> However, assuming that Oracle adheres strictly to the
> standard (which is a
> good, but not infallible, assumption),
Which imho is a bad assumption (take Oracle's outer join syntax e.g.).
> it means that we don't. Of course,
> we may just extend the standard, but in this particular area,
> I'm not sure that it's a good idea,
imho the advantage to have it is big.
> because it can be very confusing, and lead to
> inadvertent mistakes, which can be very difficult to find.
In what particular way ? Please give an example.
Imho it is bad practice if you call your labels like possible
column names anyway.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jose Soares | 1999-12-17 09:39:49 | Re: [HACKERS] \copy problem |
Previous Message | Ed Loehr | 1999-12-17 08:06:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. |