| From: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'wieck(at)debis(dot)com'" <wieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | AW: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA |
| Date: | 1999-12-13 14:49:51 |
| Message-ID: | 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C603FDC1B9@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Since lob's are typically large, the large overhead would
> be especially
> > painful, so a different relkind with another pagelayout
> seems adequate.
>
> No, I think a single Oid index on a relation, where only
> usually large tuples are stored is a very small overhead.
Well actually it will be one tuple per ~8k, so more than the
original tuple count, but I also meant the ~40 bytes per tuple
in the datapage.
But your arguments sound convincing :-)
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-12-13 14:52:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-12-13 14:34:37 | Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA |