Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items

From: ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items
Date: 1999-06-07 14:56:09
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60267B38F@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> One reason to do truncate is that if it is a symbolic link to another
> driver, that link will stay, while unlink will not, and will recreate on
> on the same drive.
>
That is the first good argument in favor of truncate other than
coding issues. I like it. It is actually very good :-)

My only concern with leaving the files around would be, that there is
a chance for other backends to write where they should not.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-06-07 14:57:26 Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-06-07 14:50:49 Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6