Re: [HACKERS] sgmr* vs. md*

From: ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sgmr* vs. md*
Date: 1999-05-19 12:16:55
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60267B36B@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> smgr is a generic i/o interface layer that allows multiple storage
> managers. Currently, we always use DEFAULT_SMGR as a parameter to smgr*
> functions, causing calls to the md* routines. Is there any value in
> just removing the smgr layer completely. It was originally for a CD
> jutebox i/o layer in addition to our current disk i/o layer.
>
Wouldn't this be the interface for a tablespace i/o manager ?
A tablespace has the advatage of only needing a number of files
for thousands of small tables, and reduces the overhead of many
open file handles. A tablespace is also needed before raw devices
can be efficiently exploited.

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 1999-05-19 12:27:16 Re: [HACKERS] PyGreSQL 2.4
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-05-19 12:06:56 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items