Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0

From: Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
To: "'Peter T Mount'" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with >2GB tables on Linux 2.0
Date: 1999-02-08 12:05:39
Message-ID: 219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C60267B2ED@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Anyhow, I'm about to start the test, using RELSEG_SIZE set to
243968 which
> works out to be 1.6Gb. That should stay well away from the
overflow problem.

How about using 1 Gb. A lot of Unices have the ulimit set to 1 Gb by
default.
It would also be nice for the looks, easy to calculate size, nicer to
storage managers,
etc ....

Andreas

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Broytmann 1999-02-08 12:37:37 VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-02-08 12:00:12 Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules