From: | "Mike Ellsworth" <younicycle(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
Date: | 2007-08-08 18:49:43 |
Message-ID: | 219951fd0708081149u4d4ab0dfnc6e97984d530bada@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On 8/8/07, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> > I was under the impression that www scrutinizes all Press Releases prior
> > to posting to the site. Not true?
>
> We do. We check them for frequency of posting from a single company (so
> noone floods the news pages), relevancy and appropriateness. We don't
> check they are factually accurate, or try to second guess the intent of
> the companies posting them.
>
> And yes, I did approve that one - despite my employer it meets all our
> agreed acceptance criteria.
>
> Regards, Dave.
Not pointing a finger in any direction, particularly at you Dave. My point
was that if it meets the criteria, then there should be no issue -- or
thread. If there is a problem with the criteria or vetting process, then
focus should be redirected to *that* as an issue.
Praise in public, criticize in private. Particularly when it's 'one of our
own'.
Thanks,
Mike
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-08-08 18:53:50 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2007-08-08 18:43:57 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-08-08 18:53:50 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2007-08-08 18:43:57 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |