From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: v16dev: invalid memory alloc request size 8488348128 |
Date: | 2023-04-16 16:26:28 |
Message-ID: | 2199319.1681662388@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 11:33:58AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> Any chance you could try and come up with a minimal reproducer?
> Try this
Thanks. I see the problem: finalize_aggregate is no longer forcing
a R/W expanded datum returned by the finalfn into R/O form. If
we re-use the aggregate result in multiple places, as this query
does, then the first use can clobber the value for later uses.
(The commit message specifically mentions this concern, so I wonder
how we failed to actually do it :-()
A minimal fix would be to force to R/O before returning from
finalize_aggregate, but I wonder if we should do it later.
By the by, I couldn't help noticing that ExecAggTransReparent
completely fails to do what its name promises it should do, ie
reparent a R/W datum into the proper context instead of physically
copying it. That looks suspiciously like something that got broken
during some other refactoring somewhere along the line. That'd be a
performance bug not a correctness bug, but it should be looked into.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-04-16 17:59:03 | Re: Direct I/O |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2023-04-16 16:16:25 | Re: Direct I/O |