| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.1beta, SunOS and shmget |
| Date: | 2005-08-30 15:28:47 |
| Message-ID: | 21970.1125415727@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com> writes:
> On Aug 29, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I just finished going through the initialization sequence to trace the
>> calculation of shared memory size, and what I find in CVS tip is that
>> it works out like this:
> Should the new formulation be sent to pgsql-docs? This looks like it
> could be worked into a patch pretty easily. Seems like it would make
> sense to update the docs for 8.1...
Already done.
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/kernel-resources.html#SYSVIPC
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2005-08-30 15:45:40 | Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-30 14:52:09 | Re: Performance gain from reduction of GROUP BY memory |