| From: | Benjamin Smith <ben(at)chico(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Postgresql 9.4 and ZFS? |
| Date: | 2015-09-29 17:01:21 |
| Message-ID: | 2196509.dx3im6Bxds@tesla.schoolpathways.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Does anybody here have any recommendations for using PostgreSQL 9.4 (latest)
with ZFS?
We've been running both on ZFS/CentOS 6 with excellent results, and are
considering putting the two together. In particular, the CoW nature (and
subsequent fragmentation/thrashing) of ZFS becomes largely irrelevant on SSDs;
the very act of wear leveling on an SSD is itself a form of intentional
thrashing that doesn't affect performance since SSDs have no meaningful seek
time. It would seem that PGCon 2013 even had a workshop on it!
https://www.pgcon.org/2013/schedule/events/612.en.html
The exact configuration we're contemplating is either (3x 400 RAIDZ1) or (4x
400 RAIDZ2) with Intel Enterprise SATA3 SSDs, with default (lz4) compression
enabled.
If this is a particularly good or bad idea, I'd like to hear it, and why?
Thanks,
BenP
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John R Pierce | 2015-09-29 17:09:21 | 9.4 and centos/yum multiversion installs |
| Previous Message | Spencer Gardner | 2015-09-29 15:59:41 | Re: pg_restore fails to restore sequences |